I have recently (Nov.’10) transitioned from an Executive Pastor role in a large evangelical church in the southern portion of the United States. I am still on staff with the same church, but now I am in a new position or role, as Church Planter/Campus Pastor for the W. Europe work we hope to start. I have the unique position of having walked in a world that many disdain. That would be a large, suburban, church from the United States that seeks to have a global reach and impact.
The particular church I serve could be categorized by some as desiring to “franchise” their brand of church around the world. That statement would be inaccurate and can only be made by someone who is not familiar with our church and the leadership. Has the church I serve made mistakes in making disciples, training, contextualizing and planting? It would be naive to think we hadn’t. Will we make more mistakes along the way? Yes, if I am one of the leaders? I am not perfect, nor am I the smartest guy to be doing what I am doing. But, we will try strategies, techniques and options to accomplish what we believe God has called us toward. Without risks and failures there will not be successes. The kingdom of God is worth the risk (humanly speaking) and the trying of many strategies.
As one who now lives in a post-Christian and post-modern context I have become very aware that there are differences between people who live in the US and people in my new culture. Their are language differences, living differences, thought process are different. The values I was taught directly and indirectly are different in some ways. Out political systems differ from one another. Our currency is different and our ideologies diverge in major points (though the US maybe getting closer to where I live).
But, there are many similarities that exist today in this new context with the people I ministered to in the US. People are relationally deficit. People have deep hurts. People long for community, but do not know how to express it. People grasp at the big questions of life but ask in different ways. People love their kids, have struggles in marriages, have financial problems, long for more free time, desire a better life and another one hundred similarities exist between those I used to minister to and those I seek to walk with today.
Now, I will get to the point….to lead change one must present a compelling vision of what can be with words, pictures, models and practitioners.
People are not motivated for long periods of time by need. Need will alert people to a problem, but only consistent visionary communication (with all means available) will effect long-term change.
I need to lose weight, so I begin working out. Need alone though is not enough to keep me working out. I must have a consistent picture of people who have made it (weight loss) to sustain the needed life change.
Sounding the need to change will only go so far…there must be practitioners pointed to as successfully modeling the preferred vision.
I believe (maybe naively) many in the US and other parts of the world realize many things need to change with churches in the US. But, there are churches that are knocking the ball out of the park when it comes to reaching a lost, post-christian, post-modern and urban society. Someone please point to them or go plant and model what others need to be doing.
We need to have real pictures that can be seen for people to understand what types of changes can to take place. Let’s show some positive examples that US pastors/leaders can gravitate toward, learn from and model after. I am talking about people who are practicing and modeling this type of ministry presently.
People and churches need good models and visionary leaders who are practitioners. That’s why books are written and conferences sell out. Leading thinkers are needed to sound an alarm, but it is always those who are practicing that lead change. If no one is implementing what the thinkers are espousing then nothing is going to happen. The church is looking for and needs practitioners they can see and learn from today. I believe they are out there…who are they?
Whether it is liked or appreciated, I believe that’s why pastors like Warren, Stanley, Young, Surratt, and many others are leading change in the US church. Their books are best-sellers, their conferences are overflowing and change is happening. Whether it is a change you like or appreciate is not the issue. They are practitioners who have presented a vision of what it could be like for the future. Many can and will argue whether their vision is a good one or the right one. But, that is for another day all-together.
I want to posit the way to lead change is to have church-based practitioners pointed toward as examples for others to model after in leading change. Pictures must be presented for others to follow. Consistently pointing out short comings will not further the cause for very long. People will only grow cynical to the voices and turn away.
So I ask…Who are the practitioners (churches) that are modeling what ministry in a post-Christian, post-modern and urban context can look like?







